Don't mention gdk-pixbuf as a direct dependency
It's a similar case to Cairo.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ librsvg = dependency('librsvg-2.0', required : get_option('librsvg'))
|
||||
xcursor = dependency('xcursor', required : get_option('xcursor'))
|
||||
libheif = dependency('libheif', required : get_option('libheif'))
|
||||
libtiff = dependency('libtiff-4', required : get_option('libtiff'))
|
||||
# This is a direct dependency of GTK+, but its usage may be disabled.
|
||||
gdkpixbuf = dependency('gdk-pixbuf-2.0', required : get_option('gdk-pixbuf'))
|
||||
dependencies = [
|
||||
dependency('gtk+-3.0'),
|
||||
@@ -51,7 +52,6 @@ dependencies = [
|
||||
xcursor,
|
||||
libheif,
|
||||
libtiff,
|
||||
gdkpixbuf,
|
||||
|
||||
cc.find_library('m', required : false),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user