Don't mention gdk-pixbuf as a direct dependency

It's a similar case to Cairo.
This commit is contained in:
Přemysl Eric Janouch 2022-02-19 21:58:27 +01:00
parent 433ede4bf1
commit a68a73cf5c
Signed by: p
GPG Key ID: A0420B94F92B9493
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Build dependencies: Meson, pkg-config +
Runtime dependencies: gtk+-3.0, glib>=2.64, pixman-1, shared-mime-info,
libturbojpeg, libwebp, spng>=0.7.0 +
Optional dependencies: lcms2, LibRaw, librsvg-2.0, xcursor, libheif, libtiff,
gdk-pixbuf-2.0, ExifTool, resvg (unstable API, needs to be requested explicitly)
ExifTool, resvg (unstable API, needs to be requested explicitly)
$ git clone --recursive https://git.janouch.name/p/fiv.git
$ meson builddir

View File

@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ librsvg = dependency('librsvg-2.0', required : get_option('librsvg'))
xcursor = dependency('xcursor', required : get_option('xcursor'))
libheif = dependency('libheif', required : get_option('libheif'))
libtiff = dependency('libtiff-4', required : get_option('libtiff'))
# This is a direct dependency of GTK+, but its usage may be disabled.
gdkpixbuf = dependency('gdk-pixbuf-2.0', required : get_option('gdk-pixbuf'))
dependencies = [
dependency('gtk+-3.0'),
@ -51,7 +52,6 @@ dependencies = [
xcursor,
libheif,
libtiff,
gdkpixbuf,
cc.find_library('m', required : false),
]