xA/xM/xW: refresh renamed buffers correctly

Rendering takes the current buffer into account,
so change its value before using it, not afterwards.

The order happened to not matter on at least Windows,
because we just queue a message.

xA/xA.go

@@ -921,11 +921,11 @@ func relayProcessMessage(m *RelayEventMessage) {
 
 		b.bufferName = data.New
 
-		refreshBufferList()
 		if data.BufferName == bufferCurrent {
 			bufferCurrent = data.New
 			refreshStatus()
 		}
+		refreshBufferList()
 		if data.BufferName == bufferLast {
 			bufferLast = data.New
 		}

xM/main.swift

@@ -842,11 +842,11 @@ relayRPC.onEvent = { message in
 
 		b.bufferName = data.new
 
-		refreshBufferList()
 		if b.bufferName == relayBufferCurrent {
 			relayBufferCurrent = data.new
 			refreshStatus()
 		}
+		refreshBufferList()
 		if b.bufferName == relayBufferLast {
 			relayBufferLast = data.new
 		}

xW/xW.cpp

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /*
  * xW.cpp: Win32 frontend for xC
  *
- * Copyright (c) 2023, Přemysl Eric Janouch <p@janouch.name>
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 - 2024, Přemysl Eric Janouch <p@janouch.name>
  *
  * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
  * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted.
@@ -914,11 +914,11 @@ relay_process_message(const Relay::EventMessage &m)
 
 		b->buffer_name = data.new_;
 
-		refresh_buffer_list();
 		if (data.buffer_name == g.buffer_current) {
 			g.buffer_current = data.new_;
 			refresh_status();
 		}
+		refresh_buffer_list();
 		if (data.buffer_name == g.buffer_last)
 			g.buffer_last = data.new_;
 		break;