From e960f4d34effe41b3d0ff327001f7df833f69cba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Andrew Gallant (Ocelot)" Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 20:43:03 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Add some style guidelines. --- nexgb/STYLE | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) create mode 100644 nexgb/STYLE diff --git a/nexgb/STYLE b/nexgb/STYLE new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b827c3c --- /dev/null +++ b/nexgb/STYLE @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +I like to keep all my code to 80 columns or less. I have plenty of screen real +estate, but enjoy 80 columns so that I can have multiple code windows open side +to side and not be plagued by the ugly auto-wrapping of a text editor. + +If you don't oblige me, I will fix any patch you submit to abide 80 columns. + +Note that this style restriction does not preclude gofmt, but introduces a few +peculiarities. The first is that gofmt will occasionally add spacing (typically +to comments) that ends up going over 80 columns. Either shorten the comment or +put it on its own line. + +The second and more common hiccup is when a function definition extends beyond +80 columns. If one adds line breaks to keep it below 80 columns, gofmt will +indent all subsequent lines in a function definition to the same indentation +level of the function body. This results in a less-than-ideal separation +between function definition and function body. To remedy this, simply add a +line break like so: + + func RestackWindowExtra(xu *xgbutil.XUtil, win xproto.Window, stackMode int, + sibling xproto.Window, source int) error { + + return ClientEvent(xu, win, "_NET_RESTACK_WINDOW", source, int(sibling), + stackMode) + } + +Something similar should also be applied to long 'if' or 'for' conditionals, +although it would probably be preferrable to break up the conditional to +smaller chunks with a few helper variables. +