Allow calling literal blocks
This commit is contained in:
parent
d1d598f968
commit
1c2db8ad6b
33
ell.c
33
ell.c
@ -819,6 +819,7 @@ execute_statement
|
||||
|
||||
struct item *following = body->next;
|
||||
const char *name = "(anonymous)";
|
||||
struct item *destroy = NULL;
|
||||
if (body->type == ITEM_STRING) {
|
||||
name = body->value;
|
||||
// TODO: these could be just regular handlers, only top priority
|
||||
@ -829,16 +830,21 @@ execute_statement
|
||||
if (!strcmp (name, "arg"))
|
||||
return rename_arguments (ctx, following);
|
||||
body = get (ctx, name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// When someone tries to call a block directly, we must evaluate it;
|
||||
// e.g. something like `{ choose [@f1 @f2 @f3] } arg1 arg2 arg3`.
|
||||
struct item *evaluated = NULL;
|
||||
if (!execute_statement (ctx, body, &evaluated))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
// It might a bit confusing that this doesn't evaluate arguments
|
||||
// but neither does "quote" and there's nothing to do here
|
||||
if (!evaluated)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// XXX: not sure whether it makes more sense to evaluate a list
|
||||
// instead of leaving it as it is -> probably evaluate, since then
|
||||
// lambdas will be better: { arg _n; print @_n } 'hello\n'
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Even though it's practically useless being able to dereference
|
||||
// function names directly that way: `@list 1 2 3` vs `list 1 2 3`
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Maybe something like (choose [@f1 @f2 @f3]) arg1 arg2 arg3
|
||||
item_free_list (evaluated->next);
|
||||
evaluated->next = NULL;
|
||||
destroy = body = evaluated;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!body) {
|
||||
struct native_fn *fn = native_find (ctx, name);
|
||||
@ -848,15 +854,20 @@ execute_statement
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
} else if (body->type == ITEM_STRING) {
|
||||
// Recursion could be pretty fatal, let's not do that
|
||||
if (check (ctx, (*result = new_clone (body))))
|
||||
if (check (ctx, (*result = new_clone (body)))) {
|
||||
item_free_list (destroy);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// FIXME: this creates a confusing backtrace for argument evaluation
|
||||
if (execute_and_set_args (ctx, following)
|
||||
&& execute (ctx, body->head, result))
|
||||
&& execute (ctx, body->head, result)) {
|
||||
item_free_list (destroy);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
item_free_list (destroy);
|
||||
item_free_list (*result);
|
||||
*result = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user